07 October 2021

What Does This Mean?


The outpouring of the Spirit on the Day of Pentecost caused a great commotion and much consternation in Jerusalem

Raging River - Photo by Jonatan Lewczuk on Unsplash
In
Acts, the activity of the Spirit is essential for the life and growth of the church, from its inception until the return of Jesus. The church was inaugurated by the outpouring of the Spirit, and then spread quickly from Judea to Samaria, Syria, Asia Minor, Greece, and finally, to the heart of the Roman Empire - [Photo by Jonatan Lewczuk on Unsplash].

Jesus commanded the disciples to wait in Jerusalem until they received the Spirit, the “promise of the Father” that would equip them to become his witnesses to the nations, even to “the uttermost parts of the earth” - (Acts 1:4-8).

The disciples tarried in prayer until the Day of Pentecost had “fully come.” At that time, the Spirit arrived “like a rushing mighty wind,” an impressive event accompanied by visual and audible effects. And many Jewish pilgrims who were in the city “saw and heard” those things. The commotion caused the crowd of “about three thousand” Jewish pilgrims to become confounded since “every man heard them speaking in his own language” - (Acts 2:4-13).

THE CROWD


The second chapter lists fifteen nations from the Near East and the Mediterranean areas that were represented by the pilgrims. The arrival of the Spirit was observed by Jews and proselytes from many nations, not just by those from Judea. And this list anticipated the implementation of the command by Jesus to preach the gospel “to the uttermost parts of the earth.”

The Jewish pilgrims were consternated because “each man heard them speaking in his own language.” What impressed them was the sound of Galileans “speaking in our own languages.” Later, Peter described the event as the “promise of the Holy Spirit, which you see and hear,” which suggests they also saw and heard the other effects of the Spirit.

We hear them speaking in our tongues the mighty works of God.” Clearly, the pilgrims present that day understood what the disciples were saying. There is no mention of “interpreters” or the “gift of interpretation.” That would defeat the whole purpose of the manifestations as evidence of the arrival of the promised Spirit.

The Jewish pilgrims were struck by the fact that Peter and his compatriots were “Galileans.” In popular thought, Galilee was a backwater territory, not only of the Roman Empire but also of Judea. To label anyone a “Galilean” was tantamount to implying he was poorly educated and little more than a “country bumpkin.”

LANGUAGES


This is the only instance in the New Testament where the exercise of the “gift of tongues” is described as a known language. Elsewhere, believers were inspired by the Spirit to speak in “unknown tongues.” Likewise, though tongues do occur again in Acts, they are never again portrayed as a known language - (Acts 10:44-48, 19:1-6, 1 Corinthians 13:1, 14:1-9).
  • (Acts 2:12-13) - “And they were all amazed, and were perplexed, saying one to another - What does this mean!? - But others, mocking, said: They are filled with new wine.
The crowd’s reaction set the stage for Peter’s sermon, which he began by citing the prophecy from Joel about the arrival of the Spirit “in the last days” (“these men are not drunk… But this is that which was spoken by the prophet Joel” – Joel 2:28).

The experiential aspect of the event must not be downplayed, both from the perspective of the disciples and of the crowd. What they “saw and heard” made deep and lasting impressions.

For example, when Peter first preached to Gentiles, they received the same experience of the Spirit as the disciples on Pentecost, which left no doubt in the minds of those present in Caesarea that God had accepted uncircumscribed Gentiles as equal members of His people - (Acts 10:45-46, 11:15-17).

The reality of what the disciples AND the crowd of pilgrims experienced on Pentecost undergirds the theological propositions of the book of Acts. And the description of the pilgrims’ reaction to what they “saw and heard” loses its point if the events were not very profound and life-changing experiences.



No comments:

Post a Comment